Past non-sexual violent offenses Finally, the scale can be deconstructed into its component items and factors, and each component examined for its ability to predict recidivism. Current test construction methods typically include an item analysis to eliminate item redundancy and determine which items are the best measures of the constructs. Log In Sign Up. The HCR and the SVR, the focus of this review, are in the second wave of risk assessment instruments, those with an empirical basis to item selection and with some degree of validation. It is not immediately apparent why sexual deviation is placed in psychosocial adjustment, while one of sexual deviation’s best indicators, high density sex offenses, is placed in sexual offenses.

The prediction of criminal and violent recidivism among mentally disordered offenders: Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology Physical harm to victim s in sex offenses Consequently, the HCR is double counting these items. The Assessment of Dangerousness and Risk. Of course, if a plethysmograph were essential to assessing sex offender risk, if its elimination from an assessment battery led to poor predictions, and if there were no alternative methods of obtaining information about deviant sexual interest, then the time and money to include it in a standard battery might be defensible. Relative efficacy of criminological, clinical, and personality measures of future risk of offending in mentally disordered offenders:


The predictive validity of risk assessment tools for female offenders: Click here to sign up.

Annotated Bibliography – Dr. Kevin S. Douglas, LL.B., Ph.D.

Improving the clinical practice of violence risk assessment: Which items are redundant, adding little explanatory power? The Contribution of Age-at-release. In part, this is a “compared to what” issue.

Major mental illness 5. Behavioral Sciences and the Law Behav.

Annotated Bibliography

Releasing the mentally disordered offender: Lacks realistic plans Appraising and managing znd. Help Center Find new research papers in: Conceptually, the division of items into past historicalpresent clinicaland future risk management is easy to grasp. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology Fifty patients were recruited from a forensic hospital and 29 from a general psychiatric hospital.

hcr 20 review and annotated bibliography

Such studies would be helpful in understanding the properties of the items. Extreme minimization or denial of sex offenses Meta-analyses have been conducted as well, empirically surveying some areas.

(PDF) A practitioner’s view of risk assessment: the HCR and SVR | Philip Witt –

Delbello Psychiatric Quarterly By actuarial, here I mean not only that the items, or criteria, were selected based on their empirical support in the literature, but also that the scale itself has predictive validity studies, bibliogralhy been empirically linked to recidivism. There are two problems with this reliance on the PCL-R.


Excellent narrative reviews exist in all these areas, surveying and summarizing the research literature. Criminal responsibility after Bill C Finally, the scale can be deconstructed into its component items and factors, and each component examined for its ability to predict recidivism.

Supply and Services Canada: Consequently, the HCR is double counting these items. Attitudes that support or condone sex offenses Future plans Citations Publications citing this paper. Research Towards Decision Guidelines. Multiple sex offense types Skip to search hvr Skip to main content. High density sex offenses Also, it is unclear what rules one can use to revoew the items to arrive at an assessment of risk.

hcr 20 review and annotated bibliography

Factors predicting acquittal and bibiography of confinement in British Columbia. Their authors take seriously the idea that research and clinical practice should enrich each other.

One of the better-researched sexual violence risk scales, the SORAG, requires a penile plethys- mograph evaluation of sexual arousal.